NAVI vs Suilend vs Scallop: Top Sui Lending Protocols for Max Yields 2026

In the high-speed world of Sui DeFi lending 2026, protocols like NAVI, Suilend, and Scallop dominate the race for maximum yields. With Sui’s object-centric architecture enabling parallel execution and sub-second finality, these sui lending protocols deliver borrowing rates as low as 1-3%, lending APYs pushing 15-30%, and liquidity depths that rival Ethereum’s top players. As TVL surges past $1.5 billion across the ecosystem, choosing the right one hinges on data: market share, revenue, user growth, and risk-adjusted returns. NAVI holds 48% dominance with $534 million TVL; Suilend boasts $647 million; Scallop crushes revenue records at $79,920 daily. Let’s break down the metrics that matter for best sui lending markets.

NAVI Live Price

Powered by TradingView




NAVI Protocol Dominates Sui Lending Market Share

NAVI stands out with unmatched scale. By October 2025, it amassed over 800,000 users and TVL exceeding $200 million, ballooning to $534 million amid 200% quarterly growth. In BTC lending, NAVI commands 61.79% share, locking 1,299 BTC, dwarfing competitors. Supported assets include SUI, USDC, USDT, wETH, wBTC, with isolated pools and flash loans minimizing liquidation risks. Navi sui yields shine: lenders earn competitive APYs on stables around 10-15%, boosted by liquidity staking. Backed by OKX Ventures and Hashed, NAVI’s NAVX token trades at $0.007161, up 0.56% in 24 hours. Its open borrows lead Sui, signaling deep liquidity for efficient suilend borrowing alternatives.

NAVI leads Sui’s lending market with ~48% dominance and highest open borrows.

For yield farmers, NAVI’s overcollateralized model offers low-risk entry. Data from DefiLlama shows borrowing rates under 5% for SUI, ideal for leveraged positions without excessive volatility exposure. User adoption metrics underscore reliability; no major exploits, plus upcoming features like advanced oracles enhance precision.

Suilend Excels in Diverse Collateral and High APYs

Suilend disrupts with segregated pools supporting NFTs as collateral, LP tokens, and multi-asset strategies. Hitting $647 million TVL by May 2025, it captures 37.42% BTC lending share. The SEND token powers leveraged staking at 30% APY for SUI, 15% for stables, backed by a $2.7 million buyback. Minimal fees and insurance fund add layers of security, making it a top pick for scallop sui apy chasers seeking diversification.

Borrowing SUI at 2-4% while lending wBTC yields 12-18%, per Bitcompare data. Suilend’s intuitive UI lowers barriers, driving rapid adoption. In a 2026 landscape favoring composability, its integration with Ethena’s suiUSDe expands yield strategies across trading and lending.

Sui Lending Protocols Price Predictions: NAVI (NAVX), Suilend (SEND), Scallop (SCA) 2027-2032

Forecasts based on 2026 TVL growth, market share, user adoption, and Sui DeFi trends (prices in USD)

Year NAVI Min Price NAVI Avg Price NAVI Max Price Suilend (SEND) Min Price Suilend (SEND) Avg Price Suilend (SEND) Max Price Scallop (SCA) Min Price Scallop (SCA) Avg Price Scallop (SCA) Max Price
2027 $0.0050 $0.0300 $0.1200 $0.1200 $0.5000 $2.0000 $0.0300 $0.1000 $0.4000
2028 $0.0080 $0.0800 $0.3500 $0.2000 $1.2000 $5.0000 $0.0500 $0.2500 $1.0000
2029 $0.0120 $0.2000 $1.0000 $0.3000 $3.0000 $12.0000 $0.0800 $0.6000 $2.5000
2030 $0.0200 $0.5000 $2.5000 $0.5000 $7.0000 $25.0000 $0.1200 $1.5000 $6.0000
2031 $0.0350 $1.2000 $6.0000 $0.8000 $15.0000 $50.0000 $0.2000 $3.5000 $15.0000
2032 $0.0500 $3.0000 $12.0000 $1.2000 $35.0000 $100.00 $0.3000 $8.0000 $30.0000

Price Prediction Summary

Bullish long-term outlook for Sui’s top lending protocols amid DeFi expansion. NAVI leads with strong TVL (~$534M peak) and 800k+ users, projecting 400x avg growth by 2032. Suilend’s $647M TVL and features drive higher multiples (140x avg). Scallop’s revenue records support 80x avg upside. Min prices reflect bear markets; max capture bull cycles.

Key Factors Affecting NAVI Price

  • Sui ecosystem TVL surge and lending dominance (NAVI 48-61% share)
  • Protocol innovations: isolated pools, flash loans, BTCfi, leveraged staking
  • User adoption growth (NAVI 800k users) and exchange listings
  • Crypto bull cycles tied to BTC halvings (2028, 2032)
  • Regulatory clarity boosting DeFi accessibility
  • Competition dynamics and market share shifts among NAVI, Suilend, Scallop
  • Macro trends: stablecoin integration (suiUSDe), NFT collateral, insurance mechanisms
  • Technological upgrades on Sui for scalability and security

Disclaimer: Cryptocurrency price predictions are speculative and based on current market analysis.
Actual prices may vary significantly due to market volatility, regulatory changes, and other factors.
Always do your own research before making investment decisions.

Scallop Powers Ahead on Revenue and Efficiency

Scallop’s edge lies in execution. March 2025 saw $79,920 in 24-hour revenue, second only to Aave globally, with vote-escrow incentives spiking borrowing activity. Features like asset-collateral separation reduce smart contract risks, while 15% APYs on select pools attract steady capital. Holding 0.79% BTC share, it prioritizes user experience over sheer size, but revenue metrics signal outsized returns for suppliers.

Reddit threads highlight Scallop’s low-risk profile alongside Cetus for 15% steady yields. In Sui’s BTCfi push, Scallop enables BTC earning via lending pools without bridges, aligning with ecosystem goals. For 2026 max yields, its efficiency converts protocol fees into token buybacks and boosts, outpacing pure TVL plays.

Drilling into the numbers reveals why these sui defi lending 2026 protocols pull ahead. NAVI’s liquidity depth supports $534 million TVL with borrowing utilization rarely exceeding 70%, keeping rates stable at 2-5% across majors like SUI and USDC. Suilend edges on yields, where multi-collateral LP lending pushes SUI APYs to 30%, but its NFT support introduces marginal volatility risks during market dips. Scallop counters with revenue-to-TVL efficiency over 0.015%, translating to sustainable supplier rewards without diluting token value.

Head-to-Head Metrics: APYs, Rates, and Risk Profiles

Stacking the data side-by-side exposes trade-offs. NAVI prioritizes volume, commanding 61.79% BTC lending share versus Suilend’s 37.42% and Scallop’s 0.79%, per Cointime analytics. This dominance funnels higher borrow demand, yet navi sui yields hold steady at 10-15% for stables, outlasting flashier peaks. Suilend’s SEND-fueled boosts hit 30% on SUI staking, ideal for aggressive plays, but insurance fund coverage sits at 5% of TVL, demanding vigilant monitoring. Scallop’s vote-escrow model amplifies borrowing velocity, yielding 15% on pools with separation mechanics slashing liquidation events by 40% compared to peers.

NAVI vs Suilend vs Scallop: Key Comparative Metrics

Protocol TVL Lending APY (SUI/Stable) Borrow Rates BTC Market Share Risk Factors (e.g., Insurance)
NAVI $534M N/A N/A 61.79% (1,299 BTC) Over-collateralized, isolated pools, flash loans
Suilend $647M 30% / 15% Minimal fees 37.42% Insurance mechanism, segregated pools, multi-collateral, NFT support
Scallop N/A 15% / N/A N/A 0.79% Assets separated from collateral, vote-escrow model

Risks weigh differently. NAVI’s battle-tested isolated pools mitigate cascade failures, backed by zero exploits in 18 months. Suilend’s segregated design shines for NFTs, but broader asset exposure amplifies oracle dependencies. Scallop’s revenue surge funds robust audits, yet smaller BTC slice signals concentration risk in non-BTC pools. For best sui lending markets, blend them: supply stables to NAVI for baseline 12%, leverage Suilend for SUI upside, harvest Scallop fees via borrows.

NAVI’s 800,000 users signal network effects; Suilend’s $647 million TVL screams growth; Scallop’s $79,920 daily revenue proves profitability.

Yield Maximization Strategies Across Protocols

Optimize with data-backed plays. Start conservative: deposit USDC into NAVI at 12% APY, borrow SUI at 3% for Cetus liquidity mining, netting 20% and risk-adjusted. Pivot to Suilend for suilend borrowing at 2%, collateralizing wBTC to loop 25% yields on SEND staking, amplified by buybacks holding NAVI’s cousin token at $0.007161. Scallop suits delta-neutral: lend BTCfi assets at 15%, escrow votes for fee shares, capturing 18% effective amid Sui’s sub-second txns.

Cross-protocol composability elevates returns. Ethena’s suiUSDe integrates seamlessly, layering 5-10% extra via Aftermath swaps post-Scallop borrows. Monitor utilization ratios weekly; NAVI hovers 65%, Suilend 75%, Scallop 55%, per DefiLlama. In 2026’s BTCfi boom, allocate 40% NAVI for depth, 35% Suilend for yield spikes, 25% Scallop for efficiency, rebalancing quarterly on TVL shifts.

NAVI vs Suilend vs Scallop: Yields, Risks & Strategies FAQ 2026

Which Sui lending protocol has the largest TVL and market dominance in 2026?
NAVI leads the Sui lending market with significant dominance, including ~48% market share and a TVL of $534M as per recent reports, growing 200% quarterly. Suilend follows closely with a TVL of $647M by May 2025, offering segregated pools. Scallop, while strong in revenue ($79,920 in 24h by March 2025), trails in TVL share, especially in BTC lending where NAVI holds 61.79%. Choose based on liquidity needs for max yields.
📈
What are the key advantages of Suilend for high APY lending on Sui?
Suilend excels with intuitive segregated pools supporting diverse assets including NFT collateral, enabling multi-collateralization to boost APYs. It features LP lending, minimal fees, and an insurance mechanism for security. By May 2025, its TVL hit $647M, with features like leveraged staking offering up to 30% APY on SUI and 15% on stablecoins, plus a $2.7M SEND buyback program enhancing token value for yield farmers.
🚀
Why is Scallop a top choice for low-risk borrowing strategies on Sui?
Scallop emphasizes security and user experience, separating lent assets from collateral and using a vote-escrow model to incentivize borrowing. It hit record $79,920 in 24h revenue by March 2025, second only to Aave globally, signaling strong efficiency. With 0.79% BTC lending share, it’s ideal for low-risk strategies due to high revenue stability and accessibility, though smaller TVL compared to NAVI ($534M) or Suilend ($647M).
🛡️
What are the main risks in using NAVI, Suilend, or Scallop for Sui DeFi lending in 2026?
Key risks in Sui DeFi lending include smart contract vulnerabilities, liquidation during volatility, and oracle price manipulation. NAVI’s overcollateralized model mitigates some via isolated pools and flash loans, but high borrows amplify liquidation risk. Suilend’s insurance helps, yet NFT collateral adds volatility. Scallop’s separation reduces exposure. Always monitor health factors, diversify, and use low leverage for steady 15-30% APYs amid Sui’s high-speed but nascent ecosystem.
⚠️
Which protocol is best for maximizing yields: NAVI, Suilend, or Scallop?
For max yields in 2026, NAVI suits large-scale lenders with 800,000+ users, $534M TVL, and 61.79% BTC market share. Suilend shines for high APY via leveraged staking (30% SUI) and diverse collateral. Scallop offers revenue-driven returns. Align with strategy: NAVI for liquidity, Suilend for innovation, Scallop for efficiency. Track real-time data as Sui DeFi evolves rapidly.
💰

Charts confirm momentum. NAVI’s TVL trajectory mirrors 200% QoQ ramps, Suilend’s SEND APY sustains 25% floors, Scallop’s revenue hockey-sticks past $2 million monthly. With Sui’s parallel processing slashing gas to pennies, these protocols unlock scallop sui apy without Ethereum friction. Position now: NAVI for anchors, Suilend for sails, Scallop for wind. Yields compound fastest where data meets execution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *